🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.